Thursday, December 27, 2012

Obama Clears the Way for Approval of First Genetically Engineered Animal

The longer this man is in office I dislike him more than I did Bush Jr. (and that is saying something).

Take a little DNA from a Chinook salmon, and a little growth hormone from an eel-like creature called an ocean pout, and what do you get? A frankenfish that grows twice as fast as wild salmon – and just as rapidly grows the profits of a biotech company called AquaBounty Technologies.

In a last-minute holiday gift to yet another biotech company that wants to play god with our food, the Obama administration has cleared the way for the FDA to soon approve the first genetically modified salmon.

Bad idea, says the Consumers Union, the advocacy and policy arm of Consumer Reports, which called the Environmental Assessment (EA) of the proposed frankenfish "flawed and inadequate."

The FDA is expected to approve AquaBounty’s frankenfish after a 60-day [yes, you read that right... even shorter than Monsantoan 90 day trials] public comment period – unless consumers, activists and common sense prevail. Here are the three top reasons to tell the FDA “NO FRANKENFISH”:

1. Harmful to human health: FDA has allowed this fish to move forward based on tests of allergenicity of only six engineered fish—tests that actually did show an increase in allergy-causing potential, according to Michael Hansen, PhD, Senior Scientist with Consumers Union.

2. Harmful to wild salmon population: Only 95% of the GE salmon may be sterile, and the rest fertile. Even 1% equals thousands of fish. Plus the fish at the egg production facility in Prince Edward Island, Canada, will not be sterile. All it takes is for some of these frankenfish to escape, and the world’s wild salmon population will be at risk.

3. Not Labeled: Without GMO labeling laws, you’ll have no way to avoid the frankenfish that will end up in grocery stores and fish markets.

It’s going to take hundreds of thousands of us telling the FDA “NO FRANKENFISH” in order to have an impact. Please make your voice heard today!

Take action!

Learn more


Plain and simple; the FDA, just like so many other government agencies, must be purged.  The FDA's mission was destroyed the very minute industry-insiders began fogging up office walls.


Similar posts:

Obama Gearing Up To Take Your Guns

Will the Natural Products Association Live Up to its Name in the Continued Fight for GMO Labeling? 

Hand-held Dental X-ray Machines Linked to Cancer Risks, 10 times Radiation of Normal X-rays

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Chinese Medical System Goes Cannibalistic

[Here we are with more news from the fabulous nation known as China... a nation whose companies can't even make pet treats or toys without them being toxic. The thing I can't figure out is, why are we even shocked by this coming from them???]

Lisa Garber
Natural Society
December 21, 2012

Chinese Pharma Companies Accused of Selling Pills Made from ‘Dead Babies’

No, that is not a typo. A South Korean SBS TV documentary accused Chinese pharmaceutical companies in 2011 of selling “stamina pills” that contain ground up dead babies. The report claims that certain hospitals and abortion clinics sell baby corpses to the companies, who then use their bodies to grind up for their stamina pill ingredients. The team ran a DNA test, and found that the pills were 99.7 percent human. They were even able to tell the gender of the baby. 

According to the documentary, Chinese hospitals and abortion clinics give stillborns and aborted babies to drug companies, but reports suggest that some of these remains even come from China’s infamous “dying rooms.” These are places in which babies are left intentionally to perish when families cannot—or, for the legal limit of having only one child lest a fee or even a physical beating be incurred by officials, will not—raise them. Chinese hospitals perform about 13 million abortions annually to keep its enormous population in check.

The companies then take the infant remains to families who are secretively instructed to keep the babies in their own homes so the companies avoid suspicion. The remains are put into medical drying microwaves and ground into pills, finally sold as so-called stamina boosters. Since August 2011, over 35 smuggling attempts of at least 17,000 capsules have been made.

The ingredients list doesn’t mention, of course, the super bacteria and other harmful ingredients in the pills. Just in case it doesn’t bother the consumers that they’re eating people.



Similar posts:

Monday, December 17, 2012

Obama Gearing Up To Take Your Guns

Capitalizing on Connecticut.

Roll Call
December 16, 2012

An emotional President Barack Obama vowed a new effort to fight violence Sunday night in Newtown, Conn., as he memorialized the 26 victims of the latest mass shooting on his watch.

“We can’t tolerate this anymore,” he said.

“These tragedies must end. And to end them we must change. We will be told that the causes of such violence are complex and that is true. No single law, no set of laws, can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act . . . but that can’t be an excuse for inaction. Surely we can do better than this,” he said.

Obama said that he would use “whatever power this office holds” to engage citizens in an effort aimed at preventing future tragedies.

“Are we really prepared to say that we’re powerless in the face of such carnage? That the politics are too hard? Are we prepared to say that the violence visited upon our children year after year after year is somehow the price of our freedom?” he said in an apparent reference to the 20 children, aged 6 to 7, who were killed on Friday along with six adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown.

Obama did not lay out a specific legislative agenda, but he framed the debate to come as one of protecting children, and one with “hard questions” for the nation.

“This is our first task, caring for our children. It’s our first job. If we don’t get that right, we don’t get anything right,” he said. “Can we honestly say that we’re doing enough to keep our children, all of them, from harm?  . . . If we’re honest with ourselves, the answer is no.”

The poignant, 18-minute address came after meeting with families who had lost loved ones and first responders.

“They lost their lives in a school that could have been any school . . . could be any town in America,” Obama said. “I come to offer the love and prayers of a nation.  . . .  Newtown you are not alone.”

Obama choked up at times as he read the names of the victims from the school who were gunned down for reasons that are still not publicly known.

“God has called them all home,” Obama said.

At the end of the speech, the president received a standing ovation.


"... as he memorialized the 26 victims of the latest mass shooting on his watch." - Oh geez, the latest mass shooting on his watch... or the second (true to sensationalism, they make a statement as if there has been a slew of massacres).  It's no mystery the author of the above piece is either enamoured by Obama or his/her bias on the subject is coming through.

Ok.  Here we go.  Again.  "Let us take some of your rights to make you feel safe".  This speech was a big dance around what he is really aiming at, and that is to kill the Second Amendment.  Besides, how does someone that has broken every single damn campaign promise they have made, protects and shelters the biotech industry and their GMO products, leaked military-grade weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels (then utilizes a scapegoat as they always do), assists radical jihadists and al-Qaeda in Libya and Syria, and opened up abortion-related aid to Africa a spokesman for all things righteous?

I will tell you this, there is only one group of people here that stand to lose and it is the average citizen.  In the state of Connecticut you must be 21 years of age to legally possess a weapon; research will show that Connecticut tends to have stricter gun laws than what is typical.  Do you honestly think your average criminal goes to buy a handgun legally and registers it (or has it otherwise tied to him)?  Absolutely not.  What about China?  The Chinese people do not have the right to bear arms, yet they still have violent occurrences - instead of guns knives are the weapon of choice for malfunctioning humans.  Are we going to ban knives too?  And if so, what then when the rare psycho arms himself with a baseball bat or pipe?  Are we going to ban bats and pipes also?  You can go all the way on this.  The problem here is people.  I can take my pen here and shove it in my coworkers eye or throat, but I don't; yet the possibility exists that someone might one day pull a Joe Pesci and do just that, so maybe we should ban pencils and pens.

Further, with municipalities everywhere having financial woes do you think that that is not going to impact emergency services such as fire and police?  A city in Pennsylvania was paying their police MINIMUM WAGE.  But let's go ahead and make sure citizens are at the mercy of either the government or criminals (in some cases the line there is blurred).

In the end, Obama and his delivery, is aimed at capitalizing upon fresh and raw emotion.  There is no other time wide-sweeping, exaggerated, and sensationalized comments would be accepted by autonomous, thinking people of middle-class communities such as Newtown, CT.  To act as if American children are, year after year, living in fear and in constant threat of massacre is beyond absurd.  

But at times like this it brings you a standing ovation.

Put it this way; I don't own a single gun, am not fascinated by them, and owning one doesn't make me excited... but I am 190% for protecting American citizen's right to bear arms and the Second Amendment.

Obama has ZERO credibility.  Obama is a globalist puppet.  Period.

Take a look at this:

We also collected data on whether owners of concealed handguns are more likely to use them in committing violent crimes. The rarity of these incidents is reflected in Florida's statistics: More than 300,000 concealed- handgun licenses were issued between October 1, 1987 and December 31, 1945, but only five violent crimes involving permitted pistols were committed in this period. And none of these resulted in fatalities. That's of 1% misuse rate for permitted pistols in an eight year period or LESS than 1/1000 of 1% misuse rate per year. 
If you took the time and did the math in regards to national averages, the current numbers would be similarly low.

As you can see here, the anti-American, pro-globalists also known as the Obamas, have had their sights on attacking and overturning our Second Amendment for quite some time... and far before the Libor Scandal kids went on their rampages.  If you don't think your President serves globalist power brokers before the Consitution, you need to do some research of your own, as just after the November election he was going with the program regarding a United Nations gun grab. 

PS - The same shit would be happening if Romney was sitting in office... and if that were the case, this post would be gunning for him. 


He is not reacting to what happened at Sandy Hook - he is using it.

Similar posts:

Libor scandal grows as the fathers of two mass murderers were to testify

Connecticut shooting victim, Victoria Soto, created a Facebook FAN PAGE four days prior...

Take a look at who Obama and NATO is supporting in Syria  

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Libor scandal grows as the fathers of two mass murderers were to testify

Kenneth Schortgen Jr.
December 16, 2012

In the wake of the mass murders that took place in Newtown, Connecticut on Dec. 14, information on the shooter, and his family, is slowly being discovered by law enforcement other sources. One interesting connection to the tragedy that took place at the Sandy Hook school is that the father of Adam Lanza has a connection to the theater shootings that took place in Aurora earlier this year by James Holmes.

Both fathers of the shooters were allegedly expected to testify in the Libor scandal that rocked the banking world in June.
The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Sentate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal. The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low level traders arrested.

 Ladies and gentlemen, we have a motive and a link. This coincidence is impossible to overlook. Two mass shootings connected to LIBOR. - Fabain4Liberty via Before it's News
Libor is the internal banking interest rate that major financial institutions determine each day for lending purposes between each facility. This rate is then translated to the interest rates used for mortgages, student loans, credit cards, and nearly every interest bearing loan in the world. Manipulation of the Libor rate has resulted in hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars in fraudulent payments made by billions of customers throughout the financial world.

For similar events on the magnitude of both Aurora and Newtown to hold a connection to one of the greatest financial scandals in the history of finance is astronomically slim in regards to coincidence. In fact, neither shooter had a history with firearm proficiency, and the outcome of each shooting showed an expertise many trained military personnel could not achieve. This leaves the question of where they got their training, or if there was another plot involved which allowed these young men to perform the actions they did with such precision.

While the coming days will bring forth more pertinent information on the motives, access, and failures of both community and family to diagnose the events leading up to Adam Lanza's killing spree, one thing is becoming disturbingly clear. The connections between the Aurora massacre, and the one that took place in Newtown on Friday, may have far more ramifications to the people involved in the Libor scandal than anyone could imagine.


Similar posts:
Connecticut shooting victim, Victoria Soto, created a Facebook FAN PAGE four days prior...
Syrian Rebels Pledge Allegiance to Al-Qaeda Group That Killed U.S. Troops 

US Recognizes Unelected Terrorists as Syrian “Representatives”

Todays intelligent searches that have brought you here...

  1. french college women naked
  2. head inside the pussy
  3. israeli women nude
  4. nude amputee
  5. san francisco nudity protests

Gee, I can't wait to see what tomorrow will bring.


Today's top search keywords that brought (you?) here...

Connecticut shooting victim, Victoria Soto, created a Facebook FAN PAGE four days prior...

Facebook fan page created for victim on December 10, 2012.  Notice no information, such as why she supposedly created a fan page for herself.

The picture above, my friends, is a screenshot of Victoria Soto's Facebook fan page... created, get this, FOUR days before the shooting massacre.  Now, let me ask you this; why does a young teacher create a Facebook fan page with zero info about why she has one [was she a band or an actress???]?  While everyone else is caught up with the date of creation I am puzzled by the actual page itself and the date it was made.  Trust me, my Facebook music page has plenty of info regarding why it is there - this one has NOTHING!  Further, it appears both pictures are screenshots from network TV (both pictures are widely circulated and she has become the face of what has transpired).  Who is posting to that account..?

Who is the admin???

Strange, no?

Pages are Facebook accounts that people hit "like" on... such as bands, celebrities, etc.  No person creates a page for themselves unless you are a public figure, artist, or egomaniac, PERIOD.  This, is a fan page for Victoria Soto... NOT a page that anyone would create to stay in touch with "friends".

Read about the differences between a page and a profile here.

"About", completely blank.  And again, the only pictures are those being circulated in the media.

Sure, the page could have been renamed... that is true.  But here's the problem, if it was changed after Friday night and it was already indexed by search engines there should be a cached version right?  And then there is the question of who makes Facebook fan pages to have them sitting there, uncertain what to do with?  And let's not mention the timing.  Weird in my book either way, but I don't think there is really any relevance to the page regarding some sort of conspiracy or black op a lot of excited people thrive on discussing.  For sure though, Obama and other government cronies will push harder to kill our Constitutional rights though.

And for sure, there are other strange things about this shooting that don't add up too well either... kind of like talking with your mouth full of food.



Here is why I don't buy the typical notion that this page was switched over from another:

This page, is a cached, earlier version, of an Enrique Iglesias fan page, which has been changed to a Sandy Hook memorial page.  If the same applied to the Soto fan page, trust me, it would have been found out - there is some smart people with lots of time on their hands.  But alas, Facebook has deleted the original Soto page which was created on December 10.

See for youself:

Meanwhile, CT police seek criminal charges against those that discuss the shooting spree from angles outside the "official" line.

These questions and opinions are crimes.  Social media is bad, inaccurate, and borders on criminality if posts are not by "authorities".  This guy is a douche bag.

To the Soto family, and all others that have lost a loved one in this event, my thoughts and sympathy is with you.


Similar posts:

Libor scandal grows as the fathers of two mass murderers were to testify

Obama Gearing Up To Take Your Guns

How the Soviets used gun control to control

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Will the Natural Products Association Live Up to its Name in the Continued Fight for GMO Labeling?

Dr. Mercola
Straight to the Source 
December 11, 2012

    As you've no doubt heard, California Proposition 37, which would have required genetically engineered (GE) foods to be labeled as such and prohibited GE-containing foods to be labeled as "natural" or "all-natural," failed to pass on November 6 by just a few percentage points.

    California is reporting that Yes on 37 garnered 48.5 percent of the vote compared to 51.5 percent on the No side.

    This was the net effect of the $50 million dollar No to 37 campaign, which saturated California voters with misleading ads. It's a testament to consumer education that they won with such a narrow margin despite outspending the Yes campaign by tens of millions of dollars.

    What they didn't anticipate was the backlash, and the inevitability of labeling now that so much awareness has been brought about in the media and word of mouth.

    Finally, Americans will have a discussion about genetically engineered monocultures and the dangers they present to our environment and our health. I want to extend my personal thanks to each and every one of you who participated in the Right To Know campaign.

    Just know that there will be plenty of opportunity to keep pushing for GE labeling in the coming year, and if the California ballot did anything, it was to massively increase awareness about GE foods across the US.

    It is a critical first step that US states pass legislation; it is the ONLY way our federal government will take action. I am going to share my opinions about Prop 37 over a series of upcoming articles.

    Here, I want to address the Natural Products Association (NPA) and ask them to protect the integrity of "Natural" and honor consumers' choice. Businesses love to market products as 'Natural' because it has value to the consumer, but what does the consumer expect from 'Natural' goods?

What is the Natural Products Association?

    The NPA is the leading trade association for natural products, leading the charge in lobbying Capitol Hill and setting the standards for natural products. The NPA mission statement reads:

        "As the leading voice of the natural products industry, the Natural Products Association's mission is to advocate for the rights of consumers to have access to products that will maintain and improve their health, and for the rights of retailers and suppliers to sell these products."

    The NPA's Natural Standard for Personal Care Products1 debuted in 2008. It was the first and only natural certification in the US, and the certification has become well recognized in the years since. NPA certified products use natural ingredients, avoid ingredients with health risks, don't use animal testing, and include a majority of biodegradable or recycled material in the packaging.

    What most people do not realize however, is that the NPA's Natural certification does not actually prohibit genetically engineered (GE) ingredients... In fact, a product can contain 100% GE ingredients and still qualify for their Natural certification! Furthermore, the Association did not support Prop. 37, and Shaw has stated the Association does not support state-by-state GE labeling efforts.

You're Being Deceived More Often than Not When Shopping for "Natural"

    As recently as November, 2012, NPA CEO John Shaw was named one of the Top Lobbyists2. He was also named as one of the top lobbyists for 2010. There can be little doubt that the NPA is in an excellent position to take a strong stand to protect consumers' right to know and push for better certification standards when it comes to natural products.

    Yet the unregulated "natural" food, supplements, and products sector, which is routinely produced with genetically engineered ingredients, toxic pesticides, synthetic chemicals, nitrate fertilizers, and livestock drugs, is actually larger than the certified organics sector. This "natural" market is worth more than $50 billion a year, compared to the certified organic sector, which is a $32 billion per year market.

    Polls show that most US consumers are confused about the difference between organic and so-called "natural" products, with many consumers believing that "natural" means "almost organic" or even "better than organic," but of course "natural" products are typically much cheaper than the organic varieties, yet typically cost more than conventional products not labeled "natural." In other words, the $50 billion+ "natural" products sector is basically built upon low or non-existent standards, and this ability to charge a premium without actually having to use premium ingredients is what's being protected by organizations fighting against GE labeling.

Who is the NPA Working for?

    So is the NPA really lobbying on your behalf on the Hill? In a recent interview with Newhope3603, Shaw is quoted as saying that:

        "NPA continues to move aggressively, in Washington, DC, and all across the US, on behalf of its members... The members at NPA are expressing confidence in us. Membership is our No. 1 priority as we move forward, not only to expand, but also to maintain current members and make sure their needs are being met..."

    So, who are the members of the National Products Association? Members4 of the NPA include not just trusted natural and organic brands, but also some of the biggest pharmaceutical and chemical companies in the world — in essence some of the premiere opponents to all things natural and/or organic, including:


    A press release5 declaring the Association's opposition to Prop. 37 promulgated one of several false statements about Prop. 37, designed to scare people away from GE labeling:

        "While the Natural Products Association... support consumers' right to know about their food ingredients, NPA has concerns regarding the enforcement provision and how the proposition defines natural foods. 'Proposition 37 places every supplier, manufacturer, and retailer of food products at risk of unreasonable and frivolous litigation,' NPA's official position said. 'We are concerned the restrictions on natural foods in the proposition language could create a difficult business environment in California and further hinder the ability of our members to sell natural products.' CRN said it opposes Prop 37 because it was not created to protect public health..."

    That's a truly telling statement. Because certainly, opposing accurate labeling of genetically engineered products is not, and cannot be, a viable stance of any organization truly dedicated to consumer rights. According to an assessment of the litigation incentives in Prop 37 by legal expert James Cooper, PhD, of George Mason University6, the scope and certainty of Prop 37 make frivolous lawsuits highly unlikely. The press release also falsely claims Prop 37 "includes bounty hunter enforcement provisions". It does not.

        John Shaw stated that, "NPA appreciates the contributions of our valued members in crafting this position."

Rising Trend: Lawsuits Against Unnatural Products Bearing "Natural" Label

    Ironically, in the wake of the failure to pass Prop. 37, consumers are taking companies to court over products using the "natural" label when in fact they contain GE ingredients. (The latest example of this growing trend is Pepperidge Farm's Goldfish Crackers7, which contains GE soy.) In November of last year, a federal court did uphold the right of states to prohibit use of the term "natural" on foods produced through genetic engineering.

    In Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.8, in ruling on a motion to dismiss, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that because the FDA has not established any definition of the term "natural," state law could be invoked to assert that a claim that genetically engineered food is "natural," is unlawful false advertising. Several other courts have also concluded that state laws regulating or restricting use of the term "natural" are NOT preempted by the FDCA as amended by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act.

It's Never Too Late to Do the Right Thing

    When it comes to genetically engineered products, the NPA seems to struggle under pressure.. Last year, in response to the lack of oversight, NPA said it was developing its own standard for natural claims on food products, which it planned to introduce in 20129. No such standards were ever introduced.

NPA NorthWest Supports Proposition I-522 to Label GE Foods...

    Interestingly enough, GE labeling supporter Roxanne Green from PCC Natural Markets10 --a certified organic retailer that supported Prop. 37 — recently joined the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the NPA. What this means is that while the NPA's CEO, John Shaw, is working against labeling of genetically engineered ingredients, the elected President, Roxanne Green, is working for it, as evidenced in the announcement that NPA Northwest supports Washington State's initiative I-522 to label GE foods in the state11.

    PCC Natural Markets has already contributed $100,000 in support of I-522 to get it on the November 2013 ballot. (The current goal is to collect 320,000 signatures, recommended by the Secretary of State's office to ensure enough valid signatures by the deadline at year's end.) On October 5, the NPA Northwest also announced a $10,000 donation in support of the labeling initiative12.

    It will be interesting to see what develops from this leadership over the long-term. My hope, of course, is that Shaw will reconsider the path the association has taken with regards to genetically engineered ingredients, and do the right thing — protect the integrity of "Natural" and support consumers' right to know.

    The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) has launched a national petition on behalf of consumers asking the NPA to "amend its certification process for its NPA Natural Seal to exclude any and all genetically modified ingredients" in order to stop consumer fraud. According to the OCA13:

        "The NPA advertises itself as working on behalf of consumers who want to purchase products that they believe are safe and authentically natural," said Ronnie Cummins, Executive Director of the OCA. "Yet nowhere in its personal care products certification process does the NPA screen for genetically modified ingredients, and nowhere on these products is there a label that says 'may contain genetically modified ingredients'. This is an outright act of consumer fraud."

    Again, there's room for hope yet that NPA as a whole will take the higher road on this issue and do what is right for consumers, not to mention help establish a firm ground of consumer trust for its members that are truly dedicated to manufacturing superior, wholesome, all-natural and/or organic, safe and health promoting products. Additionally, increasing lawsuits over false or misleading use of the "natural" label will cause the label to lose value, which will set the entire industry back to square one 14.

    No matter how you look at it, transgenic, synthetic life forms are very difficult to pull off as "natural." And if they're concerned now, they better get ready for the lawyers who took on Big Tobacco, and won, are now taking on the food industry. According to an October 15 article by BBC News15:

        "Don Barrett likes his opponents powerful, and rich. He is the lawyer whose decade-long battle to force the tobacco companies to admit they knew cigarettes were addictive and pay the medical costs of victims was depicted in the film The Insider.

        ... Mr Barrett's case against Big Food is that companies are misrepresenting their products, promoting them as "natural" or "healthy", when in fact, he says, they are no such thing. His mission is to make them stick to the letter of existing laws which, he says, regulators have been too weak to enforce. He says that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which oversees food safety in the US, has merely been writing warning letters, which he thinks will not be enough.

        ... What he himself is fighting for, he says, is people's freedom to make a choice. "Nobody's trying to tell the American people what they have to eat or what they cannot eat, the American people can make those decisions for themselves. It's all about free choice. To have free choice you have to have accurate information. That means Big Food, the food companies, have to start telling the truth about what's in their product. The law requires it."

    Yes, the issue of consumers' right to know is NOT going away..There is always more work to be done, and donating to the the Organic Consumers Fund will help several states that are pursuing the right to know genetically engineered foods by passing state legislation.

    Over 60 countries around the world label genetically engineered foods, the U.S. is finally waking up. Our food system requires transparency, it's a shame we have to fight so hard for a basic right.


Similar posts:

Payback Time: Boycott the Organic and 'Natural' Traitor Brands that Helped Kill Prop 37

Right to Know Election Statement

Monsanto Funded Anti-GMO Labeling Campaign Gets Away with Impersonating Govt. Agencies

Today's top search keywords that brought (you?) here...

  1. nackt protest studenten 
  2. naked protesters 
  3. russian naked girls
  4. topless russian protests
  5. ukraine naked women protesting
  6. protest nude
  7. protesters strip over s.f. nudity ban

Why not just go look up some porn and just give it a fucking tug?  

What is so fascinating about some women, most of which aren't even very attractive, that draw on themselves and flaunt their tits (while "protesting" exploitation and objectification)?!?  Really, it's beyond ridiculous.  

This just goes to show you we have a long road ahead before the other parts of the human population pop their heads out of their ass.  

I get the fact that guys like to look at girls and that sex sells; that is why people make erotica and pornography - go check it out, get it out of your system... get your fix and move on already.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Syrian Rebels Pledge Allegiance to Al-Qaeda Group That Killed U.S. Troops

Petition Demands Obama Stop Supporting Terrorists in Syria

Paul Joseph Watson
December 11, 2012

A new petition posted on the ‘We The People’ section of the website demands that the Obama administration cease all funding and support for terrorists and extremist rebels in Syria, as news emerges of 29 different Syrian rebel groups pledging allegiance to the Al-Qaeda affiliated Nusra Front, a group responsible for killing U.S. troops in Iraq and one that is currently the primary fighting force in the NATO-backed bid to topple President Bashar Al-Assad.

Entitled Cease All Funding and Support for Al-Qaeda Terrorists and Extremist Rebels in Syria, the petition states;

Hillary Clinton has admitted that Al-Qaeda is supporting the Syrian rebels, who are backed by the Obama administration with $200 million dollars in aid. According to McClatchy Newspapers one of these groups, Al Nusra Front, an Al-Qaeda affiliate, is now conducting “the heaviest frontline fighting” in Syria and has been responsible for terrorist attacks. Impartial observers such as Dr. Jacques Beres say the majority of rebels in Syria are foreign extremists whose goal is to impose Sharia law. These rebels have also been filmed burning U.S. flags and chanting anti-American slogans. Funding terrorists is a crime under the National Defense Authorization Act. Such activity has had disastrous consequences in the past, such as 9/11. We demand all support direct or indirect to cease immediately. 

Petitions posted on the website have to obtain a minimum of 25,000 signatures to mandate an official White House response. Only American citizens who register an account are allowed to sign.

The petition is timely given that 29 different Syrian opposition groups this week pledged their allegiance to Al Nusra, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated group which, as the New York Times reported on Saturday, “killed numerous American troops in Iraq,” dismissing the notion that Al Nusra is merely is one “bad apple” amongst the rebels. In reality, the United States is backing an uprising that has placed the imposition of Sharia law and the ultimate destruction of the United States at the core of its long term agenda once Assad is deposed.

A recent Syrian rebel quoted by McClatchy Newspapers was overheard to remark, “When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!” Other militants have appeared in You Tube videos speaking of their desire to see the Al-Qaeda flag fly over the White House once the rebels are victorious across the region.

Syrian rebels have been responsible for a plethora of atrocities, from terrorist attacks and massacres, to forcing people to become suicide bombers, to attacks on Christian churches and making children carry out grisly beheadings of unarmed prisoners.

Somewhat ludicrously, the US State Department today blamed the Assad regime itself, which has been fighting against the Al-Qaeda linked group, for allowing the Nusra Front to gain a foothold in the country.

The United States today announced that it would designate Al Nusra as a terrorist organization and place sanctions against the group. The other opposition groups in Syria who almost universally support Al Nusra and preach the same extremist doctrine are however set to receive more financial support, with direct NATO military intervention on their behalf also “imminent,” according to some sources.

In continuing to fund an uprising that is being led and executed by known terrorists while being supported by their rebel allies, the United States is breaking its own law, the National Defense Authorization Act, which specifically criminalizes support for any “associated forces” of terrorists.

Infowars is encouraging all American citizens to sign this petition and force the Obama administration to at least address the issue of why it is backing Islamic extremists in Syria with taxpayer money given similar disastrous policies in Libya that led to the attack on the Benghazi consulate and the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens.


Similar posts:

US Recognizes Unelected Terrorists as Syrian “Representatives”

Foreign terrorists and Syrian rebels kill unarmed soldiers... 

Take a look at who Obama and NATO is supporting in Syria   

France providing aid to rebel-held areas of Syria 

Hand-held Dental X-ray Machines Linked to Cancer Risks, 10 times Radiation of Normal X-rays

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
December 12, 2012

Once again, the penny pinching bureaucrats running Great Britain’s National Health Service, notable for a euthanasia program that kills 130,000 people a year, may be responsible for creating yet another unhealthy environment for British subjects.

In this case, British dentists have been warned against using a cheap, hand-held x-ray machine on their patients because they pose a significant health risk.

According to the BBC, the imported machines, known as the Tianjie Dental Falcon, expose “users and patients to 10 times the normal level of radiation, increasing their risks of cancer and organ damage.”

Doctors and dentists in such chronically underfunded, government-run health care systems are always looking for ways to curb costs. In this case, it seems as though one cost-cutting measure has been hurting the very patients they were caring for. But other bureaucrats from the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency are now asking NHS, as well as private dentists, to get rid of the devices.

Entire skull irradiated

In assessing the damage so far, officials have had to admit they don’t know how many patients have been exposed to the additional risk. So far, 13 of the Chinese-made devices have been seized at a distribution center. Most were sold on Internet sites including eBay, the BBC said. At least one dental surgery office was found to be using the dangerous device.

Officials discovered the devices were emitting excessive radiation during emergency testing of the product by the Health Protection Agency, as well as scientists at King’s College Hospital in London. There, officials found that the devices contained insufficient lead shielding inside of them to protect both dentists and patients from excessive radiation exposure.

In addition, officials found that the hand-held x-ray’s beam is too wide, meaning a patient’s entire skull and brain are needlessly exposed to the additional radiation, not just their teeth.

Further, the device poses an electrical hazard because it comes with a European-style electrical plug and travel adapter not compatible for the United Kingdom’s power system. So, besides being a major fire hazard, the device also could give dentists and patients a dangerous shock.

“Over time someone operating this machine, such as a dental assistant, would be exposed to unacceptable levels of accumulated radiation and this would have an increased risk to their health,” said Donald Emerton, a scientist who tested the device.

“I certainly wouldn’t want someone to use this piece of equipment to take an X-ray of me,” he told the BBC.

The MHRA said it believes the UK’s only distributor of the machines must be shuttered, but said investigations are ongoing to make sure no more of them can be sold and used there.

The agency said issues with the devices first came to light around June. Officials said it wasn’t clear how many of them are in circulation.

The BBC said officials with the device’s manufacturer, Zhengzhou Tianjie Electronic Equipment Co., could not be reached for comment.

Cash-strapped government systems force providers into buying cheap equipment

The devices sell for about ?200, or about $320; other hand-held dental x-ray devices for sale in the UK and around the world can cost as much as ?4,000 (about $6,500).

“It’s vital that dentists and dental staff do not buy these dental X-ray machines from eBay or other websites because they are not approved and not safe for dentists or patients,” said Bruce Petrie, of the MHRA’s Medical Devices Enforcement Team.

“We are working with eBay and other governments to ensure dentists and patients are protected,” Petrie added.

Barry Cockcroft, England’s chief dental officer, added, “It is vitally important that when buying equipment, dentists make sure it is appropriate and safe for use. I would urge all dental professionals to be cautious of seemingly cheap devices which may not be fit for purpose and potentially dangerous.”

As healthcare costs soar, government-run systems are forced to cut costs anyway they can, even if it means buying the cheapest, most dangerous equipment out there.


Similar posts:

Girl, 8, to get vaccination shots after court overrules mum

‘Biofarms’ to Integrate Vaccines, Pharmaceuticals into GMO ‘Biopharmaceutical’ Crops

Chemotherapy aids cancer...

US Recognizes Unelected Terrorists as Syrian “Representatives”

Tony Cartalucci

Dec 12, 2012

As expected, after a long pause of feigned “consideration,” the US has recognized the militants it has been arming, funding, aiding logistically and supporting diplomatically since as early as 2007, as the “legitimate representatives of the Syrian people,” with the added caveat, “in opposition to the Assad regime.” The Wall Street Journal would report that US President Barack Obama’s announcement actually read:
“The Syrian National Coalition for Revolutionary and Opposition Forces is reflective and representative enough of the Syrian population that we consider them the legitimate representative of the Syrian people in opposition to the Assad regime.”
The bizarre, uncertain wording sends a message of both  uncertainty and resounding illegitimacy, indicating that the US itself recognizes the true nature of the so-called “Syrian” opposition is apparent to an increasing number of people both in public office and across the public, and that a certain degree of rhetorical distance must be kept.

The overt, extremist nature of the militants operating in Syria has become increasingly difficult for the West to paper over. Torrents of videos and confirmed reports documenting militant atrocities, including several involving the machine gunning of bound prisoners, and a particularly gruesome video of a child handed a sword by militants to hack off the heads of bound men wearing civilian clothing, has confirmed the worst fears expressed by geopolitical analysts and foreign governments around the world – that the Syrian opposition is in fact Al Qaeda.

So damning is the evidence, that President Obama was forced to finally acknowledge this, stating:
There is a small element of those who oppose the Assad regime that are affiliated with al Qaeda in Iraq…and we are going to make clear to distinguish between those elements of the opposition.
The Wall Street Journal, in their article, “U.S. Recognizes Syria’s Main Rebel Group,” would also report:
The Obama administration on Tuesday for the first time released intelligence directly tying a powerful Syrian rebel group to commanders of al Qaeda in Iraq. U.S. officials formally sanctioned the Syrian militia, called Jabhat al-Nusra—freezing any assets it may have in the U.S. and barring Americans from doing business with it—because of fears it is gaining disproportionate power among the rebel groups seeking to overthrow Mr. Assad.
Despite this announcement, such sanctions are symbolic and selectively enforced. Also on such lists was theMujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK), and currently the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007, according to the US Army’s West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) report, “Al-Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq.” Yet in 2011, NATO had armed, funded, and provided air support for LIFG during the premeditated overthrow of the Libyan government.

US Has Knowingly Supported Al Qaeda for Years 

Based in Benghazi, elements of LIFG were behind the attack on a US consulate and the death of US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. They are also confirmed to be sending fighters and weapons through NATO-member Turkey where they stage before engaging in combat operations inside Syria.
In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, “Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” would mention LIFG by name when they reported:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, “met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey,” said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. “Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there.”
Another Telegraph article, “Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels,” would admit:
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya’s new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested “assistance” from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
“There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see.”
Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since.

Clearly they are not “secretly” organizing hundreds of fighters under the nose of the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and “sneaking” through NATO member states into Syria. They are doing with NATO-backing, with NATOadmittedly providing support for militants along Turkey’s border with Syria, utilizing the very same regional Al Qaeda networks identified by the US military during the US occupation of Iraq – which also explains where Jabhat al-Nusra is coming from.

Further undermining US claims that they have identified and are attempting to separate from the “opposition,” sectarian extremists, are admissions made as early as 2007 that US foreign policy explicitly sought to utilize these very sectarian extremists to violently overthrow the Syrian government. Indeed, in 2007, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published an article titled, “The Redirection” for the New Yorker, within which US, Saudi, and Lebanese officials described their conspiracy.

In the report it specifically stated:
“To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.” -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Hersh’s report would continue by stating:
“the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations.” -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The link between extremist groups and Saudi funding was also mentioned in the report, and reflects evidence presented by the West Point CTC indicating that the majority of fighters and funding behind the sectarian violence in Iraq, came from Saudi Arabia. Hersh’s report specifically states:
“…[Saudi Arabia's] Bandar and other Saudis have assured the White House that “they will keep a very close eye on the religious fundamentalists. Their message to us was ‘We’ve created this movement, and we can control it.’ It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs; it’s whothey throw them at—Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran.” -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The report reads like a prophecy, fulfilled verbatim during the events of the last 2 years. The Wall Street Journal report openly states that the Syrian conflict is turning into a proxy war with Iran, just as was planned in 2007. The feigned ignorance, surprise and attempts to mitigate terror groups the US purposefully created in the first place, is merely for public consumption. Bands of sectarian extremists destroying Syria was the stated plan for years, a plan now coming into fruition.

Wall Street Journal Admits Syria’s Minorities are Fighting for Lives – SNC Leader Admits He Seeks an “Islamic State” 

And even as US President Obama attempts to assure the public and the international community that the West is sorting out the extremists, the Wall Street Journal admits that militias are forming across Syria – assembled by Syria’s large minorities to protect themselves from what is clearly a sectarian assault – not a pro-democracy movement. In describing the militias, the Wall Street Journal reports:
Many come from Syria’s religious minorities, mostly the Shiite offshoot Alawite sect to which the president’s family belongs, as well Christians and Druze, who increasingly see themselves in a battle against a mainly Sunni rebel insurgency.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal attempts to portray the militias as mercenaries in the service of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, despite admitting the sectarian nature of the opposition and admitting that Al Qaeda is confirmed to be operating inside of Syria.

The sectarian nature of the bloodbath the US was engineering in 2007 was also mentioned in Seymour Hersh’s “The Redirection.” Foreshadowing was given by a former CIA officer based in Lebanon who stated:
“Robert Baer, a former longtime C.I.A. agent in Lebanon, has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, “we’ve got Sunni Arabs preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would do it, and now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites” -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Clearly, the Christians in Syria would also need protection.

And while the US attempts to reassure the world that the brood of terrorists it is cultivating and has now officially recognized as the “representatives of the Syrian people” is “pro-democratic” in nature, the very leader the US recently handpicked in Doha, Qatar to lead the new opposition coalition, Moaz al-Khatib, has admitted in an Al Jazeera interview that he seeks to establish an “Islamic state” across currently secular Syria.

Modeled after the increasingly despotic Muslim Brotherhood regime led by Mohammed Morsi, who is currentlyhiring rape gangs to help disperse protesters opposed to his expanding dictatorship, al-Khatib’s vision of Syria’s future is one even many Syrian Sunnis reject.

To declare this violent minority, augmented by foreign terrorists couching the establishment of a brutal faux-theocracy behind the paper-thin veneer of “democracy,” as the “representatives of the Syrian people” is not a “a big step” as President Obama declared. Instead, it is a step as illegitimate and morally bankrupt as it is desperate. It is a stumble forward – and one that threatens to trip up anyone within arms reach of America as it takes it.

Tony Cartalucci is the writer and editor at Land Destroyer


Similar posts:

Syria loads chemical weapons into bombs; military awaits Assad's order [an attempt to discredit the Syrian gov't]

Syrian newspaper names 142 dead foreign fighters

Syria: France recognizes terrorists as representative of the Syrian people

Take a look at who Obama and NATO is supporting in Syria   

Rolling Stones Expose Banksters, Endless Wars and the NWO
December 12, 2012

After 50 years in the Rock n’ Roll business, the Rolling Stones, the Heavy Weight Champions of Rock n’ Roll, have released a new greatest hits package that includes a hard-hitting, anti-establishment single titled, “Doom and Gloom.”

Just in time for the so-called apocalypse, “Doom and Gloom” proves once again that these guys can still deliver by sticking to their roots.

The music video depicts the destruction of the American empire as perpetual war and greedy bankers cast the population into an economic abyss. And there’s lots of symbolism in this piece, from the increase in poverty to the overcrowded prison system and even the poison in our food supply.

The Rolling Stones, at 50, are no strangers to political controversy. In 1991, their song “Highwire” deconstructed the build-up to the Persian Gulf war and criticized the politics behind it.

Take a look at the lyrics and see for yourself:

    “We sell ‘em missiles, We sell ‘em tanks;
    We give ‘em credit, you can call the bank;
    It’s just a business, You can pay us in crude;
    You love these toys, just go play out your feuds;
    Got no pride, don’t know whose boots to lick;
    We act so greedy, makes me sick sick sick.

    “We walk the highwire, Sending the men up to the front line
    Hoping they don’t catch the hell fire, With hot guns and cold, cold nights.”

“This is not about the war. It’s about how you build up some shaky dictator. You can’t build them up, ’cause then you’ve got to slam them down,” guitarist Keith Richards reportedly said at the time of the “Highwire” release.

Then in 2005, they released “Sweet Neocon,” which was highly critical of the Bush administration, no doubt a lyricial jab at the Patriot Act.

One line from “Sweet Neocon” goes, “It’s liberty for all, democracy’s our style/Unless you are against us, then it’s prison without trial.”

Needless to say the song never made a Big Bang on Clear Channel.

And now with the release of “Doom and Gloom,” it looks like the Stones have thrown themselves back into the political spotlight.

“Lost all that treasure in an overseas war, It just goes to show you don’t get what you paid for,” lyricist Mick Jagger sings in heavy protest of seemingly endless wars.

One of the recurring themes of the music video is a group of victims who are holding up question marks, as if to say, “Question everything.” When you see a build up to war, question where it came from. When the economy collapses, question the origins of the disaster.

According to “Doom and Gloom,” you won’t find the answers on your television set.


Similar posts:

Goldman Sachs Completes Economic Takeover of Europe
Gerald Celente interviewed by Alex Jones on "election" day...

Gerald Celente: On The Elections, Foreign Policy, Global Economy, and more...

Former Anglo Irish Bank chiefs sent for trial

Friday, December 7, 2012

Burglar calls 911 to save himself from gun-wielding homeowner

Dylan Stableford
Yahoo! News
December 6, 2012

A suspected burglar called 911 after the owner of the home he broke into caught and held him at gunpoint.

The suspect, Christopher Moore, placed the emergency call in Springtown, Texas, during the botched burglary attempt early Tuesday after James Gerow, the homeowner, and Gerow's son pointed guns at him as he sat in his pickup truck parked in the driveway.

"I'm out in the country somewhere," Moore told the 911 operator during the 10-minute call. "Some guy's got a gun on me."

Gerow's wife, Lindy, placed a concurrent call to 911 that confirmed Moore's account.
"You better come quick," she said, "or my husband's going to shoot him."

"If he gets out of the truck, shoot him in the legs," James Gerow told his son, according to the Dallas Morning News Crime Blog. "You ain't gotta kill him—just shoot him in the legs."

When police arrived, both Moore and Lindy Gerow were still talking to 911 dispatchers.

According to CBS' Dallas-Fort Worth affiliate, Moore was arrested and charged with burglary. He's currently being held on a $35,000 bond.


I guess, in a perfect world, one which Obama and co. would like to see materialize, Mr. Gerow would have been unarmed and a victim.


Similar posts:

John McAfee Arrested in Guatemala for Entering Country Illegally

Syria loads chemical weapons into bombs; military awaits Assad's order [an attempt to discredit the Syrian gov't]

House approves resolution to keep Internet control out of UN hands